[ CONTINUED FROM (1) ]
yeah
really
by the way
.. also ..
back in the day
.. also ..
for several years consistently,
year in year out,
the USA,
Canada,
i.e North America
Western Europe
i.e
Britain,
France,
Germany,
Italy,
etc
Eastern Europe
i.e
Russia,
etc
Australia
used to say to
Nigeria,
Black Africa
ie
Negroland Africa
and
the Third World generally that
THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE IS THE VOICE OF GOD
VOX POPULEI VOX DEI
regarding Democratic Elections for Civilian Leadership.
efforts to get the representatives of these world leading scientifically highly advanced countries possessing high technological capabalities and very sound economies ( .. which countries are in fact in more recent world history basically the leading countries of the world economically, militarily, scientifically, technologically, etc .. )
who spewed this dribble
to consider the reality that
based on detailed study and detailed observation
of the dynamics of power around the world, the dynamics of acquiring power in many countries around the world, the dynamics of attaining / achieving leadership positions in many countries around the world
in various models of governance / administration e.g democracy, military rule / armed forces rule, monarchy, etc
at the national level in particular ( i.e at the federal level – as applicable in variant to the particular country under study )
and also at other levels e.g the state [ government/administration ] level, the local [ government/administration ] level i.e municipal level, council level, etc – as applicable in variant to the particular country under study )
that the extant veracity .. virtually either without exception to the general observation/general rule or with very few exceptions, if any, to the general observation / general rule
has been that / is that
leadership positions are competed for by folks, individuals, entities, groups, etc interested in holding / wielding power and ultimately harnessed by those folks among the competitors for power who
most possess, most manifest, most deploy the “requirements required” / the “wherewithals required” in
the most clinical, the most (ruthlessly?) effective
“no-holds-barred-winner-take-all-terms”
“no-holds-barred-winner-take-all-approach”
to take / assume power in the given specific environment in which that leadership position is contested for and that the “requirements required” i.e the “werewithals required” vary from one country to another in direct relationship to the core fundamental true reality dynamics of each given specific environment / each given specific country
seemed to fall on
deaf
smug
in-their-own-estimation-all-knowing-but-in-real-terms-completely-ignorant
ears
it was explained
with examples
to these morons? that
while for the purposes of remaining on the central theme of discourse
one could leave out
MILITARY JUNTAS
MILITARY DICTATORSHIPS
MILITARY RULE
it should be noted that
MILITARY RULE is
.. like
DEMOCRATIC RULE ..
a form of Government
a form of Administration
and it should therefore be
understood in passing
and
also understood in brief
that
IN SOME INSTANCES ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL TAKE OVER LEADERSHIP FROM POLITICIANS BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE MILITARY CAPACITY TO DO SO
and that
IN SOME INSTANCES ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL TAKE OVER LEADERSHIP FROM RULING ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL VIA THE COUP-D’ETAT PROCESS BECAUSE THE INCOMING GROUP HAS THE MILITARY CAPACITY TO DO SO
and with particular reference to the nitty-gritty of our current discourse that
IN SOME INSTANCES SOME CIVILIAN FOLKS TAKE OVER LEADERSHIP VIA THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AS POLITICIANS BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE CAPACITY TO DO SO
IN SOME INSTANCES SOME CIVILIAN FOLKS TAKE OVER LEADERSHIP VIA THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AS POLITICIANS BECAUSE A COMBINATION OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND HAPPENSTANCES PLAY OUT IN THEIR FAVOUR AND CONFER ON THEM THE OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE OVER LEADERSHIP
these explanations fell on deaf, ignorant, stupid ears.
you know, His Excellency, Mr. Donald Trump has won
BOTH
THE POPULAR VOTE
and
THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE
in that process
which
.. according to rumours ..
many folks around the world rumour
is
an affront and assault on Democracy
which the USA decieves itself and the world is a Democratic Process for electing
folks into the post of President of the USA
and
which is
.. according to rumours ..
in real terms
a massive deception of the USA masses to trick them i.e con them into feeling that their votes matter in deciding who is going to be USA President
whereas their votes DO NOT MATTER IN ANY WAY ALL
and the ONLY VOTES THAT REALLY DETERMINE WHO IS GOING TO BE USA PRESIDENT
ARE THE VOTES OF A COMPARATIVELY FEW NUMBER OF FOLKS WHO MAKE UP THE USA ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
so for those folks
who aver that
THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE IS THE VOICE OF GOD
VOX POPULEI VOX DEI
and who have a thing or two to say about Mr. Donald Trump
tell me,
with regards
to
Mr. Donald Trump
winning
the recently concluded 2024 USA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
winning
BOTH
THE POPULAR VOTE
and
THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE
in
the recently concluded 2024 USA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
.. yeah, tell me ..
in regards to the electoral victory of Mr. Donald Trump, IS THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE NO LONGER THE VOICE OF GOD ?
in regards to the electoral victory of Mr. Donald Trump, IS VOX POPULEI NO LONGER VOX DEI ?
efforts to explain to these
know-alls-who-didn’t-know-a-farthing
that in many instances
the impact of
“the required requirements”
“the required wherewithals”
is so overwhelming that observed results / outcomes of some / many studied leadership position competition processes
suggested that they far outweigh any other combination of otherwise ordinarily significant variables
e.g
(1) the integrity / character / publicly known track record of the individual competitors
(11) the performance of individual competitors in televised? / recorded debates with/against the other contestant(s)
(111) the proposed plan of activities .. programmes .. lines of action of the individual contestants if/when they get into power / office.
met deaf? ears.
those deaf? ears can not now shy away from acknowledging in regards to indices (1) (11) (111) above that
with regards to
(1) the integrity / character / publicly known track record of the individual competitors
Mr. Donald Trump is for example rumoured to have instigated folks to move? against Capitol Hill and try to6 overturn the results of a concluded elections.
(11) the performance of individual competitors in televised? / recorded debates with/against the other contestant(s) Hillary Clinton (2015?) and Kamala Harris (2024?) are rumoured to have performed far much better than Donald Trump in their televised debates
(111) the proposed plan of activities .. programmes .. lines of action of the individual contestants if/when they get into power / office
in 2015?, Mr. Donald Trump said he was going to build a wall
in 2024?, Mr. Donald Trump said stuff about Mass Deportation
and even with all of these, Donald Trump has twice now emerged as President of the USA
[ TO BE CONTINUED ]
