Rihanna nnkeh nm ohfoo sorr-sorr,
Rihanna nkem ofu soso,
regarding that
IMAGERY OF YOU
sporting SILVER TEETH
on the internet
circa ELEVEN MONTHS AGO
BACK IN THE DAY APRIL 9 2024
i suppose i should start this effort at attempting to RE-POST
stuff i posted 10 months or 11 months ago
at some of your internet pages
here at our blog
by saying
Rihanna nnkeh nm ohfoo sorr-sorr ( nkem ofu soso ), Greetings and Respects.
and
then proceeding with the RE-POST as follows below 👁️👁️👉🏿👉🏿👇🏿👇🏿 :
( ■ P.S : perhaps, i should indicate here that
although
because of the whimsicalities of the internet
i sometimes screenshot material i post at some websites,
i have thoroughly searched my device for the linked screenshots of my original comments
at your internet pages
and
i have only being able to find one or two
which i have included here in this post )
👁️👁️👉🏿👉🏿👇🏿👇🏿for some reason,
the imagery here creates a recall to memory of a character in an old James Bond movie.
1979? was it ?
( the memory tends to lose acuity with the passage of time. 2024 – 1979 = 45 years ago )
starring Roger Moore
( now late i.e dead )
as James Bond.
Let and Let Live was the movie title ?
( .. or was something else ).
still,
the character in the movie did have metal teeth and
the imagery here does somehow evoke a recall to memory of that supporting?-role? character.
i suppose one can not always be original.
and it is regarded by some in the arts as
fair game
to copy? and re-adapt?
( .. i am not conversant with current trends in the sciences,
however,
back in the day it was called plagiarism if
one didn’t give due credit to the original work and/or the original author.. ).
perhaps, credit was duly given to any and or all artistes / artistic works with the original idea / originating idea.
in any case,
Rihanna does look very beautiful.
in circumstances where
one is not very clear on the issues, if any,
and
on what the issues are or may be, if any
it is often prudent to proceed by
adopting the procedure of approaching the matter from first principles
and then
moving forwards progressively from first principles.
it is procedure that is often magnificent at preventing undue error and linked inaccuracies.
thus,
Rihanna nnkeh nm ohfoo sorr-sorr
( Rihanna nkem ofu soso ),
with regards to
the images / imagery of you
with some silver-coloured material on your teeth
it’s perhaps most pragmatic
for one to take a look at the images / imagery from the view-point of first principles
and
then escalate gradually.
taking it from first principles,
there is stuff called
█ COMMUNICATION
█ MESSAGE
█ INTENT
█ CONTENT
█ INTERPRETATION
Rihanna nm,
clearly
communication is not necessarily always verbal
and
may be visual.
we need not bother ourselves here with delving into the minutae of stuff like
■ non-verbal communication
■ body language
■ etc
as
in our present context such exercise
may turn out to be
unduly diversionary.
it should suffice for us to concur that
there has been COMMUNICATION linked to the images / imagery.
having concurred that
there has been COMMUNICATION,
perhaps,
we should then take a look at exactly
what that COMMUNICATION is or may be.
to aid us in this exercise,
it may help if we take a look,
in simple terms,
at COMMUNICATION.
in this regards,
we may note that
for a COMMUNICATION to occur,
usually,
at least 2 parties / entities are needed
being specifically
a SENDER of the COMMUNICATION
and
a RECEIVER i.e a RECIPIENT of the COMMUNICATION
in the instance of the images / imagery
these basic conditions / conditionalities
have been met
with your followers and fans worldwide
who see .. or have seen .. the images / imagery
being a component portion of
the OVERALL RECIEVERS / OVERALL RECIPIENTS of
the COMMUNICATION.
if we are agreed on the aforegoing
then we can proceed forwards
and take a look at
the COMMUNICATION itself
and therefore,
also
at
the MESSAGE itself, if any
■ so what exactly is/was the COMMUNICATION in the images / imagery?
■ so what exactly is/was the MESSAGE in the images / imagery?
whatever the individual viewer
sees,
understands,
interpretes
as the COMMUNICATION in/of the images / imagery
is
fair enough to me.
whatever the individual viewer
sees,
understands,
interpretes
as the MESSAGE in/of the images / imagery
is
fair enough to me.
personally,
me,
i see
no other COMMUNICATION in the images / imagery
than that
Rihanna is very beautiful
even if
you cover? her teeth with silver-coloured material
and
even if
she puts on a large?-sized shirt.
i.e to say
personally,
me,
i see
no other MESSAGE in the images / imagery
than that
Rihanna is very beautiful
even if
you cover? her teeth with silver-coloured material
and
even if
she puts on a large?-sized shirt.
it may help us to see if this perception is correct
if we take a look at the ACTUAL CONTENT of the images / imagery.
as far as i can tell
the CONTENT
of the images / imagery
consists of
a PHOTO
and
a VIDEO-CLIP / VIDEO.
in the PHOTO
there is a lady – you : Rihanna.
in the VIDEO-CLIP / VIDEO
there is a lady – you : Rihanna.
with regards to
KEY DETAILS
in the PHOTO
the lady is wearing a shirt
and
silver-coloured material can be seen on her teeth.
in the VIDEO-CLIP / VIDEO
the lady is wearing the SAME shirt
and
blows smoke into the air probably from a cigarette or cigar?.
if that is
the
ESSENTIAL CONTENT
of the
images / imagery
perhaps
it may be of value
if we make some effort
to
identity / decipher
the INTENT
the POSSIBLE INTENT
of the creators
of the images / imagery
in / while / for
creating the images.
it may also help
if we make some effort
to see if we can
INTEPRETE
or
UNDERSTAND
the images imagery
and perhaps in so doing
grasp the message / the essential communication, if any, that
the creators
of the images/ imagery
are SENDING
or have SENT
if any.
Rihanna nnkeh nm ( nkem ),
i will avoid here
the arguments that aver that
it is possible for
a SENDER of a MESSAGE
a SENDER of a COMMUNICATION
to
SEND A MESSAGE
SEND A COMMUNICATION
that is
meaningless
i.e
a message that has no meaning
and
i will also avoid the arguments that
aver that
it is possible for
a CREATIVE ARTIST(E)
a CREATOR OF IMAGES / IMAGERY
to create stuff
to create images / imagery
that is / are
meaningless
i.e
an output that has no meaning.
i will simply say
that
for me
what i perceive
as
the INTENT
the MESSAGE
the COMMUNICATION
the INTERPRETATION
of the images is that
Rihanna is very beautiful
whether or not
the image creators
the imagery creators
place some silver-coloured material on her teeth
and
also that
Rihanna is very beautiful
whether or not
the image creators
the imagery creators
create images / imagery in which
she is wearing a shirt and
blowing smoke into the air from a cigarette or cigar?
[ TO BE CONTINUED ]
NOTICE OF WORK IN PROGRESS :
please note that while this piece has been posted,
it is in fundamental essence
and
to all intents and purposes
a WORK IN PROGRESS
and shall thus be updated and edited
from time to time accordingly
until such a time that the work stands or can stand for itself
DISCLAIMER and NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER
VIRTUALLY ALL THE PHOTOS USED IN THIS BLOG WERE SOURCED FROM AND HAVE BEEN SOURCED FROM THE INTERNET.
WE DO NOT OWN OR HOLD THE COPYRIGHT(S) TO THE PHOTOS AND WE DO NOT CLAIM THAT WE OWN OR HOLD THE COPYRIGHTS TO THE PHOTOS.
ANY INFRINGEMENT ON COPYRIGHT IS UNINTENDED AND UNINTENTIONAL.
IMMEDIATELY WE BECOME AWARE OF ANY INFRINGEMENT WE WILL DELETE SUCH PHOTOS TOTALLY, COMPLETELY AND PERMANENTLY FROM THE BLOG.