all those arguments about the KEY PARAMETERS that should be INCLUDED in ANY SCALE for rating / assessing the BEAUTY of a FEMALE / LADY / GIRL / WOMAN [1]

are probably going to continue as long as the human race exists
and
for as long as there are discussions on this topic among any gathering of homo-sapiens anywhere in the world.

it’s a topic that gets folks all excited. and sometimes agitated too.

men.
women.
boys.
girls.
she-males.
he-shes.
hermaphrodites.
no gender people.
they all have an opinion and they all have a thing or two
.. often times much more than a thing or two ..
to say on this subject matter.

my basic position has always been that
EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO THEIR OWN VIEWS AND OPINIONS
and
my starting base-line has always being that
BEAUTY IS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER.

and although i generally tend to stay in my own lane
and to generally avoid engagements that i find to be
diversionary,
distractions,
distracting, distraction-ary, distract-ive
and to be
otherwise lacking in merit and value

especially on the internet and social media 

i distinctly remember having run my own views regarding this subject on some of the pages that i have followed on the internet on some occassions between 2012? and 2018?

and

my views and/or perceptions and/or opinions
haven’t changed in any way at all
between then and now,
as far as i can tell.

all through, my starting base-line has always being that
BEAUTY LAYS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER.

by which i mean
.. and meant in all those instances ..
that
each individual has his/her personal rating scale for assessing
beauty and fine-ness
in any object / subject
be it
a car .. a dress .. a shirt .. a shoe .. a house .. a building .. or a human-being.

i guess most folks will probably have noticed that
when
you leave individuals to
their own free will
and
with plenty of funds that they can spend

and then

tell them to do the interior decor of a sitting room / parlour in a house

● using the same amount of money
● decorating the interior of the same space

they invariably, by and large, come up with different end-results.

some folks may go for metallic furniture.
some folks may go for seasoned wood furniture.
some folks may go for floor tiles.
some folks may go for carpets.

the basic reason why this happens is more or less
because
each person has/his her own idea of what an environment in which
he or she

►can feel and be very comfortable in,
►can feel and be very happy in,
►can feel and be very relaxed in

should look like
especially
an environment that they would like to stay in at anytime and at all times.

so, they tend to do the decor
according to what they actually naturally think is fine and
according to what they actually naturally like.

it’s basically the same thing when you tell
men, women, boys, girls, she-males, he-shes., hermaphrodites,
no gender people, etc 
to tell you what a beautiful lady should look like.

they tend to tell you about beauty in a woman
according to what they actually naturally think is fine and
according to what they actually naturally like.

and therein lies the difficulty in arriving at what the parameters should be
● for accepting that a woman is beautiful
● for rating her beauty comparative to other women
and
● for even determining in the first instance that she is in anyway beautiful at all

because
for instance, if a person likes tall, slender, women

anything you are going to tell him, her about how
one short or average height lady with superbly beautiful arlah/breasts
and/or
superbly big eekay/arse/ass/booty
is finer than

his/her natural choice of tall, slender, women
with small or moderately sized boobs
and/or moderately sized eekay/arse/ass/booty
is not going to sit down well with him/her.

and so it is important in any such assessment[s]
► to identify,
► to define
and
► to agree
on the parameters that will be used for scoring.

and where it is possible, the scoring should be done by
more than one person
.. maybe about 10 persons really ..

and there should be a balance
between i.e among the types of persons that constitute the judging panel.

by a balance between / among the types of persons that constitute the judging panel
i mean, for example,

that if you have a panel of 10 judges and 6 of them are
men who like very big eekay/arse/ass/booty
then women with small, average or fairly big i.e relatively big (i.e not small)
but not really large/huge or extra-large/extra-huge size eekay/arse/ass booty
are not going to do really very well in any assessment done by that panel
● no matter how beautiful their eekay/arse/arse/ass/booty is
● no matter how beautifully shaped their eekay/arse/arse/ass/booty is

and ditto regarding the assessment of the panel of judges with regards to the arlah/breasts of the ladies
i.e the same holds regarding the assessment of the panel of judges with regards to the arlah/breasts of the ladies
and
by this i mean that
if you have a panel of 10 judges and 6 of them are
men who like very big arlah/breasts
then women with small, average or fairly big i.e relatively big (i.e not small)
but not really large/huge or extra-large/extra-huge size arlah/breasts
are not going to do really very well in any assessment done by that panel
● no matter how beautiful their arlah/breasts are
● no matter how beautifully shaped their arlah/breasts are

and if you have a panel of 10 judges and 6 of them are
women who are jealous of any woman who is really beautiful
then all the beautiful women among the contestants are going to get
very low scores
because of the jealousy and envy of the jealous/envious women judges
which will invariably reflect one way or another in the scores that
they will give to the contestants
and
as a result, despite their self-evident and obvious i.e clearly manifest beauty the beautiful ladies among the lot of contestants
will not get overall scores that will place them
( as should ordinarily be the case )
as being the most beautiful in that lot of contestants.

the point here is that
the judges themselves are human-beings
and as such
they have their own individual, personal biases, preferences and/or idio-syncracies

and
these their personal biases, preferences and/or idio-syncracies
will invariably affect the results
of the panel of judges.

as a matter of fact,
in a highly competitive beauty contest with superb prizes e.g
$1,000,000:00 for the over-all winner,

a judge who is broke or looking for money
may accept a bribe or an inducement of $5,000?
from a contestant to score her 10/10
and
if that contestant spends say $5,000 to get 7 of the 10 judges
to be on her side
and the 7 judges are all persons who can be influenced
by monetary inducement
or by other inducement if a money offer fails e.g
an offer of going to bed with the contestant before and/or during the competition in exchange for a score of 10/10,

it’s a fair bet that that contestant who
● is spending money doling out pay-outs to the judges in order to win and the judges are accepting and taking the money
● is making non-monetary offers to the judges in order to win and the judge are accepting those offers
● is spending money doling out pay-outs to the judges in order to win and also making non-monetary offers to the judges in order to win and the judge are accepting the money and those offers
has got that $1,000,000:00 cash prize
even before the competition/contest starts

no matter how beautiful any and/or all the other females
who participate in that contest are.

again, the issue of the ethnicity/race of the judges also matter[s].

END OF [1]

CONTINUED IN [2]