all those arguments about the KEY PARAMETERS that should be INCLUDED in ANY SCALE for rating / assessing the BEAUTY of a FEMALE / LADY / GIRL / WOMAN [2]

CONTINUED FROM [1]

again, the issue of ethnicity / race of the judges also matter[s].

if you have a panel of 10 judges and 6 of them are white, aryan men and women it’s going to be a fair impossibility for any black, negro lady among a bunch of contestants comprising also of white, aryan ladies to be selected as being the most beautiful in that lot of contestants.

and even if
by any stroke of luck
or on the sheer merit of the magnificence of your natural beauty
you happen to, for example, be
a black person and win a notable beauty contest in the USA, for example, the mechanistics of the
” pull him/her down just because he/she is black syndrome ”
may not let you hold that title peacefully.
remember? the absolutely terrific Vanessa Williams

anyway, as i was saying,
if you have a panel of 10 judges and 6 of them are black, negro men and women it’s going to be a fair impossibility for any white, aryan lady among a bunch of contestants comprising also of black, negro ladies to be selected as being the most beautiful in that lot of contestants.

you can alternate those terms there : “black, negro” and “white, aryan”
with any other terms like

● “asian” .. “india-type-asian” ..
● japan-type asian” i.e “mongoloid asiatic” ..
● “arab”..
● “eskimo” ..
● “melanesian”
● etc

for effect.
the point still remains the same.

Yohanna ormmahleechar nm, given the challenge embedded in the procedure by
►the difficulty in arriving at
universally acceptable and universally agreed parameters
for the assessment of beauty

►the impact of the inherent prejudices and biases of the
members of the judging panel on results

Yohanna nnkeh nm, i find that i generally
tend to stick by my own opinion[s] on this issue
and to stand by them in the face of arising polemic[s], if any.

and taking that as a summary of my views, Yohanna nnmaah nm,
and then going forward into the minutae,
the parameters that i would proffer for any such rating
and the linked rating scale
would probably be something more or less like :

[1] TABLE ONE / TABLE A :

Yohanna my dear, every one knows that
► a person’s body does not consist of only his/her front or front body parts
and that
► every human-being’s body has a side.

so, in my own opinion, there is value in also assessing the beauty of a person as she looks/appears when seen from the side.

my parameters for this rating would include :

[2] TABLE TWO / TABLE B :

also, a person’s body does not consist of only his/her  front and side.
and furthermore also, every human-being’s body has a back or back-side.

so, in my own opinion, there is value in also assessing the beauty of a person as she looks/appears when seen from the back / back-side.

my parameters for this rating would include :

[3] TABLE THREE / TABLE C :

Yohanna, if you look at those tables there, you will notice that
each table there has 20 parameters.

that means, in effect,
for example, that using the “score/marks out of 10 marks grading”
you will get
a total of 20 x 10 marks = 200 marks per table.

so if a lady scores for example, 140 marks out of 200 marks,
to convert it to percentages
simply multiply by 100 i.e

140/200 x 100 = 0.7 x 100 = 70%

alternatively, Yohanna nm,
using the “score/marks out of 100 percent grading”
you will get
a total of 20 x 100 percent = 2000 percent per table.

so if a lady scores for example, 1400 percent out of 2000 percents,
to convert it to the 100% units
simply multiply by 100 i.e

1400/2000 x 100 = 0.7 x 100 = 70%

a person may be more striking / more beautiful when seen from the front.

a person may be more striking / more beautiful when seen from the side.

a person may be more striking / more beautiful when seen from the back.

so, technically, really,
the average of the scores of a person

when seen from the front
+
when side from the side
+
when seen from the back

will give you the over-all score of the person.

so, if for example, a person scores

70% when seen from the front
+ ( plus )
70% when side from the side
+ (plus )
70% when seen from the back

then the person’s overall score will be

70% + 70% + 70% = 210% divided by 3 = 70%

Yohanna aezeegboh oryie nm,
there might also be a further need to proffer a precise scale of rating
for the judges on the panel to go by
for some of those parameters.

for example,
for ITEM 1 = HEIGHT,
if a lady is 6 feet tall, do you give her 100% ?

now, if you give a lady who is 6 feet on the dot 100%
and there is another lady there who is taller, say : 6 feet 7 inches tall,
do you give her the same 100% as someone who is just 6 feet alone ?

and furthermore for example,
if a lady is to score 50% or 5/10 for height,
how tall exactly should she be ?

5 feet 3 inches ? or 4 feet 11 inches ? or what exactly ?

END OF [2]

CONTINUED IN [3]