CONTINUED FROM [1]

again, the issue of ethnicity / race of the judges also matter[s].

if you have a panel of 10 judges and 6 of them are white, aryan men and women it’s going to be a fair impossibility for any black, negro lady among a bunch of contestants comprising also of white, aryan ladies to be selected as being the most beautiful in that lot of contestants.

and even if
by any stroke of luck
or on the sheer merit of the magnificence of your natural beauty
you happen to, for example, be
a black person and win a notable beauty contest in the USA, for example,
the mechanistics of the
” pull him/her down just because he/she is black syndrome ”
may not let you hold that title peacefully.

remember? the absolutely terrific Vanessa Williams

anyway, as i was saying,
if you have a panel of 10 judges and 6 of them are black, negro men and women it’s going to be a fair impossibility for any white, aryan lady among a bunch of contestants comprising also of black, negro ladies to be selected as being the most beautiful in that lot of contestants.

Iggy Azalea

you can alternate those terms there : “black, negro” and “white, aryan”
with any other terms like

● “asian” .. “india-type-asian” ..
● japan-type asian” i.e “mongoloid asiatic” ..
● “arab”..
● “eskimo” ..
● “melanesian”
● etc

Ariana Grande

for effect.
the point still remains the same.

Yohanna ormmahleechar nm, given the challenge embedded in the procedure by
►the difficulty in arriving at
universally acceptable and universally agreed parameters
for the assessment of beauty

►the impact of the inherent prejudices and biases of the
members of the judging panel on results

Nicki Minaj ( Mrs. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty )

Yohanna nnkeh nm, i find that i generally
tend to stick by my own opinion[s] on this issue
and to stand by them in the face of arising polemic[s], if any.

and taking that as a summary of my views, Yohanna nnmaah nm,
and then going forward into the minutae,
the parameters that i would proffer for any such rating
and the linked rating scale
would probably be something more or less like :

Rihanna Robyn Fenty

[1] TABLE ONE / TABLE A :

No.PARAMETER  SCORE OUT OF 10 MARKSSCORE OUT OF 100  PERCENT
AFRONT VIEW  
1HEIGHT    
2BEAUTY OF FACE AND HEAD    
3BEAUTY OF NECK    
4BEAUTY OF SHOULDERS AREA    
5BEAUTY OF TORSO    
6BEAUTY OF BREASTS    
7SIZE OF BREASTS    
8BEAUTY OF STOMACH    
9FLAT-NESS OF STOMACH    
10BEAUTY OF WAIST    
11FIGURE-8 CURVE AT WAIST    
12BEAUTY OF THIGHS    
13
HOUR-GLASS CURVE OF THIGHS  
  
14FLESHINESS OF THIGHS
15
BEAUTY OF LOWER LEGS FROM KNEE TO FEET  
  
16
BEAUTY OF LEGS AS A WHOLE FROM WAIST TO FEET  
  
17BEAUTY OF FEET AND TOES    
18
BEAUTY OF UPPER ARMS FROM SHOULDERS TO ANKLES  
  
19
BEAUTY OF LOWER ARMS FROM ANKLE TO HANDS  
  
20
BEAUTY OF HANDS AND FINGERS  
  
TOTAL    

Yohanna my dear, every one knows that
► a person’s body does not consist of only his/her front or front body parts
and that
► every human-being’s body has a side.

Eudoxie Yao

so, in my own opinion, there is value in also assessing the beauty of a person as she looks/appears when seen from the side.

Beyonce

my parameters for this rating would include :

[2] TABLE TWO / TABLE B :

No.PARAMETER  SCORE OUT OF 10 MARKSSCORE OUT OF 100  PERCENT
  B   SIDE VIEW  
1HEIGHT    
2BEAUTY OF SIDE OF FACE AND SIDE OF HEAD    
3BEAUTY OF NECK    
4BEAUTY OF SHOULDERS AREA    
5BEAUTY OF TORSO    
6BEAUTY OF BREASTS    
7SIZE OF BREASTS    
8BEAUTY OF STOMACH    
9FLAT-NESS OF STOMACH    
10BEAUTY OF WAIST    
11FIGURE-8 CURVE AT WAIST    
12BEAUTY OF THIGHS    
13
HOUR-GLASS CURVE OF THIGHS  
  
14FLESHINESS OF THIGHS
15
BEAUTY OF LOWER LEGS FROM KNEE TO FEET  
  
16
BEAUTY OF LEGS AS A WHOLE FROM WAIST TO FEET  
  
17BEAUTY OF FEET AND TOES    
18
BEAUTY OF UPPER ARMS FROM SHOULDERS TO ANKLES  
  
19
BEAUTY OF LOWER ARMS FROM ANKLE TO HANDS  
  

20

BEAUTY OF HANDS AND FINGERS  
  
TOTAL    

also, a person’s body does not consist of only his/her  front and side.
and furthermore also, every human-being’s body has a back or back-side.

so, in my own opinion, there is value in also assessing the beauty of a person as she looks/appears when seen from the back / back-side.

my parameters for this rating would include :

Serena Williams

[3] TABLE THREE / TABLE C :

No.PARAMETER  SCORE OUT OF 10 MARKSSCORE OUT OF 100  PERCENT
  C  BACK VIEW    
1HEIGHT    
2BEAUTY OF BACK OF HEAD    
3BEAUTY OF NECK    
4BEAUTY OF SHOULDERS AREA    
5BEAUTY OF TORSO    
6BEAUTY OF WAIST    
7FIGURE-8 CURVE AT WAIST    
8BEAUTY OF BUTTOCKS    
9SIZE OF BUTTOCKS    
10SHAPE OF BUTTOCKS  
11HOUR-GLASS AND FIGURE-8 CURVE/SHAPE OF BUTTOCKS    
12BEAUTY OF THIGHS    
13
HOUR-GLASS CURVE OF THIGHS  
  
14FLESHINESS OF THIGHS
15
BEAUTY OF LOWER LEGS FROM KNEE TO FEET  
  
16
BEAUTY OF LEGS AS A WHOLE FROM WAIST TO FEET  
  
17
BEAUTY OF ACHILLES HEEL AND FEET ( ??? )
  
18
BEAUTY OF UPPER ARMS FROM SHOULDERS TO ANKLES  
  
19
BEAUTY OF LOWER ARMS FROM ANKLE TO HANDS  
  
20BEAUTY OF BACK OF HANDS AND FINGERS ( ??? )    
TOTAL    

Yohanna, if you look at those tables there, you will notice that
each table there has 20 parameters.

that means, in effect,
for example, that using the “score/marks out of 10 marks grading”
you will get
a total of 20 x 10 marks = 200 marks per table.

Jennifer Lopez

so if a lady scores for example, 140 marks out of 200 marks,
to convert it to percentages
simply multiply by 100 i.e

140/200 x 100 = 0.7 x 100 = 70%

alternatively, Yohanna nm,
using the “score/marks out of 100 percent grading”
you will get
a total of 20 x 100 percent = 2000 percent per table.

Ciera Rogers

so if a lady scores for example, 1400 percent out of 2000 percents,
to convert it to the 100% units
simply multiply by 100 i.e

Ciera Rogers

1400/2000 x 100 = 0.7 x 100 = 70%

a person may be more striking / more beautiful when seen from the front.

Irene The Dream

a person may be more striking / more beautiful when seen from the side.

Irene The Dream

a person may be more striking / more beautiful when seen from the back.

Irene The Dream

so, technically, really,
the average of the scores of a person


when seen from the front
+
when side from the side
+
when seen from the back

will give you the over-all score of the person.

Irene The Dream

so, if for example, a person scores

70% when seen from the front
+ ( plus )
70% when side from the side
+ (plus )
70% when seen from the back

Irene The Dream

then the person’s overall score will be

Irene The Dream

70% + 70% + 70% = 210% divided by 3 = 70%

Yohanna aezeegboh oryie nm,
there might also be a further need to proffer a precise scale of rating
for the judges on the panel to go by
for some of those parameters.

for example,
for ITEM 1 = HEIGHT,
if a lady is 6 feet tall, do you give her 100% ?

now, if you give a lady who is 6 feet on the dot 100%
and there is another lady there who is taller, say : 6 feet 7 inches tall,
do you give her the same 100% as someone who is just 6 feet alone ?

and furthermore for example,
if a lady is to score 50% or 5/10 for height,
how tall exactly should she be ?

Chrisy Chris

5 feet 3 inches ? or 4 feet 11 inches ? or what exactly ?

Chrisy Chris

END OF [2]

CONTINUED IN [3]

By sam

Samuel Ojekwe is essentially just your basic everyday fellow that you see in your neighbourhood while you go about doing your stuff and who, like you, wishes and hopes that the world becomes a better place for all of us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *