with regards to the referred to imagery
at some of the internet pages of Jada Kingdom
it is perhaps best that
one looks at the imagery
calmly and rationally
with the added deliberate disposition
of
resisting the tendency to assume that
the referred to imagery in the context of the genealogical history
of Jada Kingdom ( in regards of whom the imagery is displayed )
as :
■ a negro
■ a negro female
■ a carribean female
■ a west indies / west indian female
■ a black negroland africa female
■ a female negro of black negroland africa ancestry
is an
insensitive,
premeditated,
deliberate,
intentional
slur and insult
targeted at
all persons of Negroland Africa heritage world-wide
pivoted centrally on the era(s) of world history
during which
black Negroland Africa females and males
were en masse
brutalized, tortured, maimed and killed
in the reality of
█ the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade
which manifested with
millions of Negroland Africa persons
shipped against their free-will
as captured slaves and/or sold slaves
for hundreds of years
from West Africa, for example,
across and over the Atlantic Ocean
to
▼ the Carribeans i.e the West Indies
▼ the Americas e.g United States of America, North America
▼ Europe e.g Holland i.e the Netherlands
█ the Trans-Saharan Slave Trade
which manifested with
millions of Negroland Africa persons
herded against their free-will
as captured slaves and/or sold slaves
from West Africa, for example,
across and over the Sahara Desert
to
the Arab World
regarding which historical reality
it is still rumoured today 2020 A.D
that for many generations
the personal body guards of
the Arab King of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
were males sourced from Nigeria as slaves
and castrated in Saudi Arabia for the purpose of serving as
personal body guards to the harem i.e the wives of the King
and as
personal body guards to the King himself.
looking at the imagery
from a calm, rational, un-biased, un-polarized perspective,
permit me to ask you – the reader
what do you perceive or guess is the CONTENT of the imagery ?
i.e
that is say
what do you understand
.. upon viewing the imagery ..
to be the CONTENT of the imagery ?
what do you
guess and/or see
and/or
perceive and/or understand
to be the
the INTENT and/or INTENTION of
the creator or purveyor of the imagery
— especially in the context of it’s usage
as material linked to a person
.. female or male ..
of Negroland Africa genealogy ?
if you possess the
courage, forthrightness and honesty
required to INTERPRETE the imagery
what MESSAGE,
if any,
would you say
that
the imagery is COMMUNICATING ?
[ TO BE CONTINUED ]
DISCLAIMER and NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER
VIRTUALLY ALL THE PHOTOS USED IN THIS BLOG WERE SOURCED FROM AND HAVE BEEN SOURCED FROM THE INTERNET.
WE DO NOT OWN OR HOLD THE COPYRIGHT(S) TO THE PHOTOS AND WE DO NOT CLAIM THAT WE OWN OR HOLD THE COPYRIGHTS TO THE PHOTOS.
ANY INFRINGEMENT ON COPYRIGHT IS UNINTENDED AND UNINTENTIONAL.
IMMEDIATELY WE BECOME AWARE OF ANY INFRINGEMENT WE WILL DELETE SUCH PHOTOS TOTALLY, COMPLETELY AND PERMANENTLY FROM THE BLOG.
ARTISTIC LICENSE, IT’S WIDE-SWEEP ALL-ENCOMPASSING CIRCUMFERENCE AND THE OUTLET WHICH IT’S ALL-ENCOMPASSING VEIL PROVIDES FOR ARTISTES WITH DEPRAVITY AND WORSE RAGING DEEP INSIDE THEIR SOUL(S) TO EXPRESS THEIR DEPRAVITY AND ALL
By sam
DEC 12, 2020 artistic license, chicanery, depravity, duplicity, jada kingdom, mendacity
what the veil of artistic license sometimes does is that it provides a cover .. a forum .. an outlet .. under the shield provided by the term / terminology / word “art” and/or “art-work” for the artist(e) to produce for other persons to see the wickedness and depravity, etc inside him / her.
at other times it allows absolutely inferior stuff to be passed on as spectacular, truly superb work.
in other words, it allows for the application of mendacity in determining the true value / worth of a/any work of art.
a bit like fire .. or water .. or electricity.
they exist. virtually everywhere really. and their all-encompassing utility value cannot be denied.
and so, for example, one can make a fire with which to cook or do something useful.
and one, can alternatively, use fire in arson and for the damage of valuable items.
just as one can use water to cook or do something useful.
and on the other hand folks can drown in rivers, ponds and swimming-pools.
and just in the same way as one can use electricity to provide lighting and power electrical equipment.
and on the other electricity itself can kill by electrocution.
witness as reference example of artistic license in action
● the cover imagery on Jada Kingdom’s love situations album
● imagery posted at a social media page of Jada Kingdom sometime back in the day and culled from there and pasted here below.
as a base-line, every art-work i.e anything produced by any one as art or an art-work has by the very reality of it’s own existence, form and content.
no matter how mediocre.
that it’s form and content which constitutes the very basis of it’s existence i.e
that it’s form and content which constitutes it’s make-up
is essentially what determines what it is and what it’s message, if any, is.
i stand to be corrected.
by anyone .. no matter how elevated or un-elevated .. in any genre / sphere of art and/or in any other field of endeavour .. anywhere in the world.
█ as for the cover imagery of Jada Kingdom’s love situations album, what exactly is the imagery there ?
as far as the eye can see when i.e on looking at it,
what is there is
a drawing / sketch of a female / girl / woman
wearing only a bra and pants
with her hands tied together above her head
and her feet tied together at the ankles.
the drawing / sketch suggests i.e creates the impression that the female is hanged-up by her hands i.e suspended above the ground via the ropes used to tie her hands.
very frankly, what sort of bull-shit is this ?
the images that come to mind on seeing this art-work? in connection with Jada Kingdom are the historical? images of
► black / negro slavery in the caribbean(s) / west-indies
► slavery of black ( negro ) women / black ( negro ) girls / black ( negro ) females in the caribbeans / west-indies
particularly given the very reality that Jada Kingdom is a Jamaican and therefore Caribbean / West-Indian Black Negro female.
and the images that come to mind on seeing this art-work? and not linking it in anyway with Jada Kingdom and/or the caribbeans are the historical? images of
► torture and/or torture of females
► bdsm against women/females of some particularly horrendous and horrific nature
in either instance, the imagery is a depiction of wickedness of some sort and/or depravity of some sort.
what were those wordings again ?
artistic license.
yes. those were the words and wordings.
█ as for the imagery in a drawing / sketch / art-work posted up at a social media of Jada Kingdom sometime back in the day, what exactly is the imagery there ?
what is there is
a drawing / sketch of a female / girl / woman
who is completely / totally naked ie nude i.e with no clothing at all on her body
in a sort of upside-down position
with her legs up in the air and spread open
and her torso/ body held up by her hands.
the drawing / sketch shows a plant placed/located in the female sexual reproductive organ of the woman in the photo. and also, there are 2? plants? located at her breast/nipple.
very frankly, what sort of bull-shit is this ?
i guess it is probably best to leave the individual viewer alone with
the images that come his/her mind on seeing this art-work? in connection with Jada Kingdom
and
the images that come his/her mind on seeing this art-work? and not linking it in anyway with Jada Kingdom and/or the caribbeans.
all the same, be that as it may be,
it is difficult? to dispel the veracity? that the imagery seems to reflect depravity of some sort and/or wickedness? of some sort.
and, yeah. oh yeah. what were those words again ?
artistic license.
yes. those were the words and wordings.